Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap criticized Indian multiplexes for providing limited screens and poor showtimes to smaller Indian films [1, 2].
This dispute highlights a growing tension between independent creators and cinema chains that prioritize immediate revenue over artistic diversity. Kashyap said this systemic preference threatens the long-term growth of Indian cinema by stifling word-of-mouth projects in favor of high-budget event movies [3, 4].
Kashyap specifically pointed to the distribution of his film “Bandar” and Imtiaz Ali’s “Main Vaapas Aaunga” [1, 2]. He said that theaters are effectively killing these films by favoring big-budget Indian releases such as “Dhurandhar” and Hollywood titles like “Obsession” [1, 2].
Reports indicate that “Bandar” received screenings starting after 1 p.m. across many multiplexes [5]. While some reports suggest the film received almost no shows [2], others note these specific afternoon time slots amidst stiff competition [5].
Kashyap expressed frustration with the industry's reliance on expensive spectacles. "For every Dhurandhar, five expensive films will bomb," he said [2]. He questioned why Hollywood films like “Obsession” receive better show timings than domestic Indian movies [3].
The filmmaker also noted a disconnect between theatrical support and later digital consumption. "I get upset when fans praise my films years later on OTT, they never supported them in theatres," Kashyap said [1].
This pattern of allocation creates a cycle where smaller films struggle to find an audience despite potential critical success. By limiting visibility, multiplexes may be prioritizing short-term gains from established franchises over the development of new cinematic voices [3, 4].
“"For every Dhurandhar, five expensive films will bomb."”
The conflict reflects a broader structural shift in the Indian exhibition model, where multiplexes operate as risk-averse retailers rather than cultural curators. By prioritizing 'event' cinema and Hollywood imports, theaters maximize immediate ticket sales but potentially alienate a diverse range of filmmakers, pushing independent cinema toward direct-to-streaming releases.



